Forum Posts

Aug 16, 2021
In General Discussions
This phrase has now featured against two meetings, recorded by the RM in their 'Timeline' as having taken place. The first was chaired by a member of the CFHT and the second by a member of the BBP (on zoom I understand). If both were indeed run in the manner described by that phrase, I would have expected some progress to have been achieved. Surely the aim of holding a 'without prejudice' meeting is to allow those involved to get matters resolved. An alternative possiblity is that using WP can keep dicussions out of the public domain.
More actions